Thursday, March 20, 2008

Andrew Keen's "The Noble Amateur"

In Andrew Keen’s article, The Noble Amateur he discusses how he feels about the idea of citizen journalists or journalists that have no formal training or expertise, but offer up their opinions as fact. Keen very much dislikes this idea and also websites such as Wikipedia and blogs that are widely read as factual information. He states that, “we are undermining the authority of the experts who contribute to a traditional resource like the Encyclopedia Britannica”, he goes on to say that the more these free, user-generated sites are used the more it threatens the core of our professional institutions. Keen believes that because of these types of websites, we, the people are suffering because we are not finding the correct information when researching because these sites are coming up and not sites that were written by experts in that area.

I would say that I disagree with the author because I believe that without some of these blogs and citizen journalists, we, the people would suffer because we would miss out on some first hand experiences of actual events that these “journalists” are witnessing and then writing about. Like for example during Hurricane Katrina witnesses that actually were experiencing the horrible devastation in New Orleans were able to capture what was truly happening there. They were able to let the rest of America know how they were feeling and what was actually occurring, compared to some news anchor in Indianapolis just telling us about the hurricane.

Also, just because an expert is giving us the information does not mean that it is always trustworthy. Another example would be the events that led up to the Iraq war. All the information we Americans received about Iraq and the impending war was gathered by experts. We later found out that all the information the “experts” gave us was not completely correct.

Keen states in the article that these citizen journalists “lack not only expertise and training, but connections and access information”, but I ask you who has more access someone who is actually there blogging about something they have or are experiencing or some prestigious, “expert” news journalists.

1 comment:

scatzer said...

I'm sorry that Andrew is not "Keen" on citizen journalism. The reality is Andrew's status as an elite purveyor of information is threatened by having more voices in the conversation. He's just protecting his turf!

Spin doctors and "public relations specialists" working for special interests are taking over the ranks of the "experts" being used as sources by traditional media. With Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, etc, it is vitality important that the "experts" information is investigated and challenged. The members of the traditional media outlets are employing a well used tactic, discredit the messenger before anyone pays attention to their message.